2023 Predictions: Using Historical Patterning to Predict Future World Events
A demonstration on how to use historical patterning to predict events for a given year
Old calenders (l to r): Egyptian, Roman, Julian, Hebrew, and Muslim by Fernando T. de Gorocica - via Wikimedia Commons
Background Information
I’ve long looked for patterns in history, and while I could find some parallels, it wasn’t until these last few years that I started to realize there might be “year pairs” —that is, two years in which parallel events happen, or something that was initiated in one year, comes full circle in its ‘paired’ year.
What I present below seems only to stretch approximately 50 years but will continue to reach into the past as we move forward in time linear time.
Studying historical patterns is nothing new, but I decided to research it on my own since I’ve been noticing so many current events lining up with events in the not-so-distant past. To be clear, I have not examined all of these pairs to determine if they are, in fact, true pairs. However, the ones I’ve looked at follow this pairing trend for significant events (not necessarily minor ones).
And if these pairs are as true as I suspect they are, there is an inflection point/year from which we can work. See below.
*Bolded years are of no particular importance. I simply used bold so that the pairs are easier to distinguish.
Here are the year pairs, along with the inflection point (year):
2023 - 1973; 2022 - 1974; 2021 - 1975; 2020 - 1976; 2019 - 1977; 2018 - 1978;
2017 - 1979; 2016 - 1980; 2015 - 1981; 2014 - 1982; 2013 - 1983; 2012 - 1984;
2011 - 1985; 2010 - 1986; 2009 - 1987; 2008 - 1988; 2007 - 1989; 2006 - 1990;
2005 - 1991; 2004 -1992; 2003 - 1993; 2002 - 1994; 2001 - 1995; 2000 - 1996;
1999 - 1997
Inflection Point/Year: 1998
Going Forward: 2024 - 1972; 2025 - 1971 (and so on)
Deciphering Calendars
Now that we know the year pairs, it’s important to mention that they don’t seem to follow our exact calendar years (Gregorian). So while this subject deserves an article of its own, I will keep it as brief as possible for our purposes.
The short of the long is that with all the chicanery around our calendars over centuries, we can’t entirely rely on the Gregorian calendar for making accurate annual predictions.
I estimate every true year starts in March of the Gregorian calendar and runs through the end of February of the following year, with the occasional bleed over into March (before the Spring Equinox).
Year of 2023 = March 1, 2023 - February 29, 2024 (approximately)
Using this reasoning, we are currently at the end of 2022.
So, why this approach to the calendar?
Have you ever wondered why our 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th months don’t have names to match their respective positions in the Gregorian calendar?
Let’s look at some Latin words and definitions:
septem - seven
septimus/septemus - seventh
octo - eight
octavo - eighth
novem - nine
nonam - nineth
decem - ten
decima - tenth
You will also find direct relationships between the Greek and Latin words, as Latin was influenced by Greek (a language 2000+ years older than Latin). And since many words in the Romance languages are derived from Latin, you’ll see several parallels in meanings. For example, seven in French is sept. Eight in Spanish is ocho. Nine in Italian is nove.
So, let’s treat the months as they are named.
September = 7th month, not 9th
October = 8th month, not 10th
November = 9th month, not 11th
December = 10th month, not 12th
Therefore, making January the 11th month and February the 12th.
And since the calendars Westerners have used were created in the Northern Hemisphere, it makes sense that the end of winter would align with the end of a calendar year.
(The calendar we’re using for this article is closest to the Roman one, as shown in the image above.)
Prediction for the End of 2022 (i.e. January - February/early March 2023)
Pair Year: 1974 (March 1974 - February 1975)
Presidential Removal
During this time, President Nixon was forced to resign from office and was replaced by his Vice President, “establishment puppet,” Gerald Ford.
If you want the truth about why the establishment wanted to get rid of Nixon, check out the video linked at the bottom of the article. I was shocked beyond belief to hear a mainstream talking-head drop so much truth in such limited airtime.
While there are many personal differences between Joe Biden and Richard Nixon, I suspect we’ll see Biden ousted from office by the Uniparty before the Spring Equinox. And I suspect he , too, will be forced to resign. (I discuss why in my GarageGate article.)
The Internet
Contrary to popular knowledge, the Internet has been around for quite some time in various iterations dating back to the late 1950s. However, it only became commercialized in the 1990s. In the US, the Department of Defense established and ran their own, which was called ARPANET. It was officially operational in 1971 and laid the groundwork for today's Internet. However, in 1974, ARPANET experienced a programming bug that routed all traffic through a Harvard server, causing it freeze/go down.
Since we are at the end of the Year 2022 cycle, will we see the Internet go down in the US (or globally)? While the US Government ran ARPANET and its time offline was supposed to be accidental, will the USG be responsible for taking the Internet offline in these next couple of months? If so, which faction of the USG would spearhead this?
With the World Economic Forum having just wrapped up their extravagant global dominance conference in Davos this past week, I wouldn't be the least surprised if the Web goes down before the Spring Equinox. But would it just go down only in the US? And all the effects felt worldwide?
After all, the WEF consistently speaks about the risk of "cyberattacks from Russia" or EMP that could take down the Internet as well as the need to cleanse it of "disinformation." If the Web goes down, I sense it will be taken offline by humans and will be a false Carrington Event. For how long? Who knows.
Regardless of if/when/who/why the Web goes down, I suspect it will come back online in a different state than before. Who and what agenda is responsible for such changes remains to be seen.
Predictions for 2023 (March 1, 2023-February 29th, 2024)
Pair Year: 1973 (March 1, 1973 - February 28th 1974)
Vice Presidents
In October 1973, Spiro Agnew, the first Vice President under Nixon, resigned due to charges of tax evasion and accepting bribes. In 2023, will Kamala Harris resign due to criminal charges? If not, the following section presents another interesting possibility.
After Nixon & Biden’s Removals
Once Nixon resigned, Gerald Ford finished the term but lost his bid for President to Jimmy Carter, who took office in 1977. This marked a shift from Republican to Democrat.
If Kamala Harris becomes President and isn't removed from office or forced to resign (an article unto itself), she could finish the term but will not win in the 2024 elections should she decide to run. And, if we follow historical patterns, that election will see a significant shift from Democrats/leftist agendas towards those of Republicans/conservatism.
Gerald Ford chose Nelson Rockefeller to be his Vice President. And in the US, you can't get any more "establishment" than a Rockefeller, except maybe a Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Astor, Mellon or a Du Pont. Should Kamala Harris take over after Biden's departure, expect someone from a large, influential family to fill in the role of VP. My money is on Gavin Newsom, the current Governor of California, who's related to the Gettys and the Pelosis.
(Note: While Nixon was a Republican in many ways, his ideas around monetary policy were Keynesian in nearly every way (associated with leftists). He also admitted as much a while after leaving office.
US Withdrawal from War
In 1973, the US ended its involvement in the Vietnam War. While the US signed the Paris Peace Accord on January 27, 1973, the agreement gave them 60 days to withdraw forces and bases. That puts us at March 28, 1973, right at the beginning of “our” 1973 as noted above this paragraph.
As a result, the US could withdraw its funding for the war in Ukraine in 2023. We will also see it withdraw any further offers of arms. Since this has been a US-run proxy war with Russia, it will become apparent to the American public and the rest of the world that Russia has won and everything the mainstream media has been saying about Ukraine obliterating Russia will be proven untrue.
The Middle East, Israel, War, Oil & the US
In 1973-1974 (year pairs of 2022 & 2023), during the October Arab-Israeli War of 1973, the Middle Eastern oil-producing countries declared an Oil Embargo against the United States as retaliation for resupplying the Israeli military. The result? US oil prices jumped just over 400% from $2.90/barrel to $11.65/barrel.
We could see a repeat of an Arab-Israeli War, but this time the Arabs could successfully liberate the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and Golan Heights. Should the US decide to support Israel this time around—highly likely—we could experience another oil embargo.
The extraordinary effects of such an embargo could push the US to return to being the energy-independent nation it was during the Trump administration.
Interestingly enough, the Alaska Oil Pipeline bill was passed in 1973. Construction began on the pipeline, which would source oil from the North Slope of Alaska. Could the US restart the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2023 due to an oil embargo?
Watergate, “RussiaGate” & “GarageGate”
In 1973, the Watergate trial commenced, and while the entire thing was a scam, we could expect one or more such trials in 2023. This year, a trial(s) may reveal crimes perpetrated by the establishment.
Such news could come from a case Special Counsel John Durham presents in front of a Grand Jury on the RussiaGate scandal, convicting Hillary Clinton, members of her election campaign, or others involved. Another such situation that could end up in trial is GarageGate, and if it does, I suspect it could take down more politicians than just Biden.
So while Watergate covered up the crimes of the CIA and their involvement in the murder of JFK—see video at the bottom of the article—a major trial of a politician(s) in 2023 would bring this all full circle by taking a wrecking ball to the establishment that has worked against the American people (and those of the world, quite frankly) for so long. Such trials would not destroy the establishment but would deliver a significant blow to it.
Unusual Solar Activity
In 1973, there was a coronal mass ejection (CME), which became the most studied CME ever. And since we’ve heard much talk of solar activity these last couple of years, I would not be surprised if we see a CME in 2023 and a potential blackout in a particular area of the globe.
Britain’s 3-Day Week
As in the US, Britain struggled with massive price increases in the early and mid-1970s, especially as people’s pay was not keeping pace with the continuous rise in living costs. As a result, strikes and protests kicked off, including government workers and coal miners. Without coal miners busy at work, electricity was soon in short supply.
Under the conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath, the Fuel and Electricity (Control) Act 1973 was introduced. This Act was intended as a multi-pronged approach to keep Britain running—conserving coal and reducing electricity use—amidst the turmoil. However, one of its constraints was The Three-Day Work Order, which limited commercial use of electricity for 3 consecutive days each week for regular hours (no extended hours permitted). This, of course, led to mass layoffs of factory workers.
Since coal was the primary source of electricity at that time, it’s no surprise both the commercial sector and everyday Britains experienced rolling blackouts. Even TV stations had to cease broadcasting after 10:30 pm each night. Understandably, radio, pamphlets, and books took center stage in most people’s lives for entertainment during this period.
Of course, it’s a much more complex topic than this description, but this is a general outline of what we could potentially see in Britain this year. Maybe winter 2023-2024, possibly due to the inevitable hyperinflation coming our way?
Other Major Events
I could go on writing this for days, but for the sake of your eyes and mind, here is a short list of other significant events that we could see come either full circle or parallel in 2023 (from 1973):
The Cod Wars (Iceland won the 3rd of the Cod Wars in 1973 if I'm not mistaken) The UK, with support from Germany, fought Iceland over fishing rights in the North Atlantic. Who will Britain have their next fishing rights war with? Or will Iceland become the instigator of such a conflict in 2023?
Northern Ireland passed a referendum to remain part of the United Kingdom in 1973. Will another such referendum crop up in 2023 for Northern Ireland? Will it reaffirm the country's desire to remain part of the UK? Or will they vote to leave?
General Pinochet led a military coup in Chile on September 11, 1973, against President Salvador Allende. Will Chile see another military coup? I don't follow Chilean politics very closely these days, so I cannot lend any valuable insight.
Many car plants in the US closed in 1973, laying off more than 100,000 employees.
Looking Backwards and Forwards
We have covered many historical events, but I've saved the overall state of the world in terms of monetary policy and globalism until this section, as these issues span several years.
Let's start with 1971. After France publicly accused the US of printing more money than it had in gold reserves—guilty as charged!—and thus, violating the Bretton Woods Agreement, Nixon ended the US dollar's gold convertibility, thereby turning it into a fiat currency. He did so in the name of "cheap money," though he never would've said as much. Instead, he claimed it was "to create a new prosperity without war."
The great irony is that not having an asset-backed currency gives Congress and the Federal Reserve carte blanche to print “money,” making war easy to fund and carry out.
This cycle of monetary debasement and destruction will eventually come full circle, and we could see the reconstitution of the US dollar as an asset-backed currency in 2025 (1971's 'year pair').
This move by Nixon led to a tremendous devaluation in the dollar, destroying Americans' savings (by reducing buying power). In the 70s, interest rates got as high as 20%. The most challenging period of the Great Inflation, as it was known, lasted from late 1972 until the early 80s.
Could the US see interest rates get that high in 2023? I don't think so, but this is most likely the year we see the entire house of cards—built on "cheap money," aka fiat—come crashing down. I sense that economic hardships, including mass lay-offs in the US, will parallel those of the Great Inflation. Things will get harder before they get better.
In 1972, President Nixon made that famous trip to China to meet with Chairman Mao. The primary focus of this trip was to upset the balance of power in the Cold War. However, it would also become the world's first step toward full-blown globalism. Nixon convincing the insular country to open its doors to the world by suggesting the great prosperity the Chinese could experience led us to where we are today.
Therefore, in 2024 (1972's pair year), I wouldn't be surprised to see this come full circle with China closing its doors to the world and focusing on domestic supply and demand. And this is not very far-fetched when looking at the country's considerable decline in economic output these last few years. Note: 2021 was the first year China's economy shrank since becoming a global economic player nearly 50 years prior.
In 2021, the "pair year" for 1975, many Chinese factories closed down due COVID, floods and energy (coal) shortages, leading to supply chain problems. People all across the world experienced unavailability of products and many items were on backorder. Despite ending its Zero Covid policy, China is still struggling to function as it did pre-2020.
Last is the little-known Lima Declaration, produced by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) in 1975. This brief 23-page document, loaded with seemingly innocuous language, was actually the foundation for the globalism we know today. This "initiative" aimed to redistribute world industry to third-world countries so that they would have at least 25% of said global industry by 2000.
This turned "third-world countries" into "developing nations" and simultaneously led to a gradual but massive decline in the economies of developed nations. Many developed nations were once able to meet vast swathes of their own needs through domestic production but can barely do so today. Most of these countries have gone from production-based economies to service-based economies.
Wrap Up
These last few years have felt as though civilization—and I use that word very loosely—entered into the last stage of a death cycle, much of which is rooted in events from the 1970s. (But don’t worry, I suspect rebirth is on the horizon, and it will become a visible overlap with our death cycle very soon.)
Ultimately, I suspect this patterning will continue to help us determine major future events and better understand those in the past. Eventually, I intend to see if I can detect different historical patterns further back in chronological time without being constrained by these specific ‘year pairs.’ I sense history comprises layers upon layers of patterns, many of which intersect and overlap, and in this article we’re barely scratching the surface.
Videos to Check Out
Truth About JFK & Nixon Starts at 07:00 — Despite my intolerance for Tucker Carlson’s laugh, his blatant smugness at times, and his role in a corrupt media, he actually speaks truth here:
A Propaganda Video of Nixon’s Role in Opening Up China:
Britain’s Three-Day Week Documentary by the BBC:
It certainly would be a hair-on-fire moment! Let's hope the country doesn't get to that crossroads.
And I'm glad you got something from the piece, Jim. I write for two reasons: to make sense of things for myself and to share whatever that may be with others. And despite this article's many exhaustion-induced typos from writing most of yesterday, your comment tells me that I managed to do so––and that means a lot. Thank you!
I've heard it said that history doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes. This piece certainly seems to support that. As is usually the case with your work, I've learned something. It's impressive, compelling, and a little terrifying. Gavin Newsom as VP, and eventually POTUS? That's a hair-on-fire moment!